Sunday, July 20, 2008

Hydrogen vehicle

A transition to hydrogen vehicles could greatly reduce U.S. oil dependence and carbon dioxide emissions, says a new congressionally mandated report from the National Research Council, but making hydrogen vehicles competitive in the automotive market will not be easy. While the development of fuel cell and hydrogen production technology over the past several years has been impressive, challenges remain.
Vehicle costs are high, and the U.S. currently lacks the infrastructure to produce and widely distribute hydrogen to consumers. These obstacles could be overcome, however, with continued support for research and development and firm commitments from the automotive industry and the federal government, concluded the committee that wrote the report.
Light-duty vehicles, such as cars, SUVs, and pickup trucks, are responsible for 44 percent of the oil used in the United States and over 20 percent of the carbon dioxide emitted. Concerns over climate change, oil imports, and recent spikes in gasoline prices have spurred interest in the development of alternative fuels. In 2003, President Bush announced a $1.2 billion initiative to encourage development of hydrogen production technology and fuel cell vehicles, which are powered through a chemical reaction between hydrogen and oxygen and emit only water and heat as exhaust.
The committee estimated the maximum number of hydrogen vehicles that could be on the road in the coming decades, assuming that practical technical goals are met, that consumers want hydrogen cars, and that government policies are in place to help drive the transition from oil to hydrogen fuel. The findings therefore represent potential best-case scenarios rather than predictions.
According to the committee, it will take many years before hydrogen vehicles will significantly penetrate the light-duty fleet, even though technological developments have been progressing rapidly. Production of hydrogen vehicles could increase significantly by 2015. At this stage, their cost -- although dropping rapidly -- would still need to be heavily subsidized for consumers.
The maximum practicable number of hydrogen vehicles that could be on the road by 2020 is 2 million, says the report. By 2023, the total cost of fuel cell vehicles, including the cost of hydrogen fuel over a vehicle's lifetime, could become competitive with conventional vehicles. At that point, the number of hydrogen vehicles on the road could grow rapidly, to nearly 60 million in 2035 and 200 million by 2050.
The committee also calculated the investments, both public and private, that would be needed to make a complete transition from oil to hydrogen fuel. These costs include research and development, vehicle deployment, and establishing infrastructure. According to the committee, government support via strong policy initiatives as well as funding would be needed until at least 2023. The cost to the government would be about $55 billion between 2008 and 2023; private industry would be expected to invest $145 billion over that same time period. To put these numbers into perspective, the government subsidy for ethanol fuel could grow to $15 billion per year by 2020.
The shift toward hydrogen fuel would not have a large impact on oil usage or greenhouse gas emissions until hydrogen vehicles make up a significant portion of the market. If hydrogen vehicles eventually took over the market, there would be great decreases in both, although the overall effect on greenhouse gas emissions would depend upon how the hydrogen fuel was produced. The committee compared these reductions with those that might be achieved by either improving the fuel efficiency of conventional vehicles or by converting to biofuels. Because they can be implemented more rapidly, both of these options could produce reductions in oil use and emissions faster than hydrogen, but after about 2040, hydrogen would become more effective.
The greatest possible reductions would occur if biofuels, fuel-efficient conventional vehicles, and hydrogen vehicles are all pursued simultaneously, rather than seen as competitors. This "portfolio approach," if accompanied by government policies driving a transition toward reduced oil use and low-carbon fuels, could reduce greenhouse gas emissions from cars and trucks to less than 20 percent of current levels and could nearly eliminate oil demand for these vehicles by 2050, the committee said.
The study was sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy. The National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, and National Research Council are private, nonprofit institutions that provide science, technology, and health policy advice under a congressional charter. The National Research Council is the principal operating agency of the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering.
The report is entitled "Transitions To Alternative Transportation Technologies: A Focus On Hydrogen."

Top 10 Tips for Writing a Winning Solution

Tip #1: You can download the Solution Submission Form and Solver Submission Guideline documents for your use. To access these documents, click on the “Submit a Solution” button located within the Project Room of a Challenge.
Tip #2: Carefully re-read the Challenge description and make sure that you completely understand both the goal of the Challenge, the Technical Requirements, and the required deliverables as stated under the heading “Project Criteria” in the Challenge statement.
Tip #3: As a rule of thumb, the most successful submissions are organized as small articles, like you might see in a newspaper. We recommend starting with a Summary or Introduction that describes the essence of your idea in one short paragraph stating precisely what your submission is all about.
Tip #4: Following your Introduction, the Main Body of your proposal is typically composed of the detailed description of the Solution and an experimental section if required. If appropriate, briefly introduce the area of science, technology or business your solution refers to.
Tip #5: The majority of InnoCentive Challenges include specific Solution Requirements. It is very important to address these requirements – ideally, point by point – at the end of the Main Body of your proposal. Don’t neglect this part even if your solution doesn’t meet some of the Technical Requirements. Although optional, you may want to add a Conclusion to your submission and use this section to reiterate your major achievements and to emphasize the novelty of your approach.
Tip #6: Explain everything; don’t assume that “everyone knows that!” For example, do not send an article or brochure and say “the answer is attached, just read it.” The Seeker is looking for you to do the work and point specifically to the answer. It is acceptable to attach an article as reference material, but you should explain exactly what and where the answer is and why it is important to the Seeker.
Tip #7: Try not to pad your proposal with “frills” or “attachments.” Too much extraneous material may overwhelm the Seeker and make it difficult to find your solution in your proposal. You want to make it easy for the Seeker to find your solution, understand it, and award it.
Tip #8: Before uploading your solution proposal to the Project Room, make sure that your submission is complete. Only complete submissions are eligible for full cash award. If the Challenge requires submission of a material sample, please include a statement that the material is in your possession and is ready to be shipped.
Tip #9: Describe your proposed idea as completely (but succinctly!) as you can. Refer to literature, patent or business precedents to make your case stronger. It’s almost always necessary – and always advantageous – to include a list of references you have used to write the proposal. Be specific, and use only the references that are immediately relevant to your approach.
Tip #10: From time to time, similar ideas/solutions are submitted for the same Challenge. When this occurs, the Seeker will give preference to the submission with the earlier submission date. So don’t risk an award opportunity by waiting until the last minute.
I hope you find these helpful. If you have any other suggestions or comments, please share!